So does this mean that if I don't have a Simon Le Bon Pool on my bedroom floor, I'm not a real fan?
posted by Marla at 3:04 PM
Tuesday, September 11, 2007
About Me
- Name: Marla
- Location: Brooklyn, New York, United States
When I was in third grade, I went through a phase where I'd write my name on my papers faster than I could think it. So I'd end up being Marfield Garfield or Marla Garla for the day. Alas, Marfield Garfield just doesn't quite fit as an e-mail address ... and thus, Garla. Just another attempt to make things in life fit.
Previous Posts
- Mmm, carnage.
- Man hands! She had man hands!
- Oh, no. Now we're gonna have to have a talk and ev...
- My question to you is this:
- Quote of the Day
- If you have a problem discussing mucus and poop, d...
- Seattle times
- Three Weekends, Three Islands
- A bowl of sauerkraut?!?
- Boom.
8 Comments:
oy, again with the oj nonsense. i don't have the energy to go thru this again.
I'm right with you. Especially since law nonenforcement is going to bend to personal interests again screw the whole thing up the way they did in Brentwood, and it's going to fester and molt and linger and when the end comes in forever from now, will anything have been accomplished? OJ is far too loaded a character for people to not use the situation for their own gain. Another mess.
Which is to say, I agree.
whatever peeps. c'mon now. mistah simpson done gets to be innocusent until proved guilty. the fine people of brentwood said he was innocusent, so he haz to be. let the law run its coars in las vegas to and i know the lord will be on oj's side alwayses.
Give me a friggin break Anon #2 - OJ was guilty. Guilty, guilty, guilty. Just because the simple-minded and profoundly distracted and brainwashed jury in the first case found him "innocusent" doesn't mean he was. Wake up and smell the java, baby. This time I doubt the lord will be on OJ's side. Even god gets to the point where he says, "I'm out!" And you know the old saying...break the law once and get away with murder, shame on you; break the law twice and try to get away with armed robbery and assault with a deadly weapon, shame on any court that let's this monster back on the streets.
OK, folks. I know this subject has the potential to get heated, so I want to say this out of the gate:
I'm a firm believer in the free exchange of ideas, and, concerning my blog, the thing I love more than anything is that readers of so many opinions and backgrounds and tastes come here to read it. It's been the most pleasant surprise of all, considering I set it up fully aware that I could likely be the only person who read it. I absolutely love you guys, and I'm thrilled I can give you something you (hopefully) enjoy. This is a good, cathartic, chill place for me to come to, and I want it to be that for all of you, too.
So, having said that, I'm going to ask that, if you're going to debate about OJ, please keep it kind and civil and respectful of others' opinions. I myself am going to pull out of the conversation (I've just never been inclined to participate in an OJ debate), so I'm going to bow out unless it gets ugly, but I know he's a polarizing figure for many people, so I'm not going to shut the conversation down despite my personal feelings on and level of interest in discussing the topic.
It's fine if you don't agree with each other. I welcome it. I'm all too often a contrary person. But if you're going to engage in this debate, please mind each other and the spirit of why you come here.
Thanks.
Whatev's. Post something new and we'll get off the topic of OJ altogether.
I'm working on a new one, promise. Been super-busy. But this one will be worth the wait, as it will feature a photo of a contraption that strengthens the kegel muscles.
Seriously, beat that.
What's wrong with Ben-Wa Balls? Kegels are supposed to be active not passive. Whatever contraption could this be?!
Post a Comment
<< Home